Petitions
Petition
re the City Building Bill (first)
The
New Zealander 11th February 1854
‘[As
we have inserted above one of the Petitions on the subject
of the Building Bill, with the names appended, we
think it fair to re-publish the following also with the
names, which were not given when it previously appeared
in our columns.]
‘The
Petition of the undersigned proprietors and inhabitants
of the City of Auckland, humbly sheweth:-
‘That
your Petitioners are deeply impressed with the necessity
of some immediate steps being taken for the prevention
of fire within the city; and that no measure appears to
them so well calculated to effect this object as a law,
prohibiting the further erection of wooden buildings within
reasonable limits.
‘That
your petitioners are of opinion that the time has now
arrived when, from the wealth of the settlement, it
can no longer be deemed a hardship that, at all events,
within the principal streets, all future buildings should
be of brick or stone, and particularly when it is considered
that the longer the present systems of wooden erections
is continued, the calamity will be the more certain
to overtake us and the losses and hardships which will then
fall upon us be immeasurably increased. Moreover, your petitioners
believe that many parties are now anxious to erect buildings
in brick or stone but are deterred from so doing because
they do not thereby obtain an equivalent security, seeing
that their neighbours may surround them with wooden buildings.
‘Your
petitioners have also reason to believe, that were such
a measure passed into a law, in a few years they would be
able at moderate premiums to effect insurances against losses
by fire, which at present is found to be all but impossible.
‘May
it therefore please your Honourable House to take such immediate
steps as you may think proper towards ensuring the safety
of the town by prohibiting erections of wood for the future
within such limits as may be considered advisable.
‘And
your Petitioners, etc……….’
BLACK,
Alexander
BRIGHTON, William
BROWN
& CAMPBELL
BUDDLE,
Thomas
BURNS,
David
CLARK,
Arch.
CLARK,
Robert
COMBES,
Walter
COOLAHAN,
Hugh
DALLISTON,
J J R
DAVIS,
Charles
DAVIS,
Louis
DAVY,
Edwin
DOUGLAS,
Thomas
DUNNING,
James
ELLIS,
H
FORSAITH,
Thomas S
GOERGE,
James
GRAHAM,
David & Co
HALLAMORE,
Thomas C
HARDINGTON,
Henry
HAY,
William
HENDERSON,
J & W
HOPKINS,
Charles
HUGHES,
S E
HUGHES,
W
IRELAND,
John de Courcy
JAGGAR,
Thomas James
JARVIE,
Jamieson
KEESING,
A & R
|
KEMP
J & R
KENNEDY, Alexander
KEVEN,
Thomas
LANGFORD,
J A
M’DONALD
& BRADIE
MACFARLANE,
John
MACKY,
Thomas
MATTHEWS,
Richard
MILLER,
Alexander
MILLER,
William
MOTION,
William
NATHAN,
David
PALMER,
James
PHILLIPS,
Phillip A
PHILSON,
T M, MD
RATTRAY,
William
RIDINGS,
Richard
RUSSELL,
Henry
RUST,
J & J
SALMON,
John
SHEDDAN,
R
SMITH,
J A
STITCHBURY,
Charles
TATTERSALL,
William
TURNER,
William
WALKER,
James
WARDELL,
Edward
WATT,
J H
WAYTE,
Edward
WOODHAM,
F B
|
The
New Zealander 11th February 1854
Petition re the City Building Bill
(second)
'
It
appears oppressive in the highest degree, to compel parties
to erect expensive buildings, at a time when not a single
line or level of any street is determined and consequently
no security afforded that buildings thus erected may not
one day be ruined or at least materially injured by the
inevitable alterations that must take place in some cases
and may take place in many.
'In
consequence of the scarcity of labour of all descriptions,
building materials are enormously dear and, in fact, scarcely
procurable, joined to the circumstances of the numerous
immigrants daily arriving, it appears to your petitioners
unwise to add anything to the already existing difficulties
on this head.
'A
number of your petitioners belong to the humbler classes
of society but are struggling to place themselves in circumstances
of independence by every possible means, are holders of
leases for land in various parts of the City and they conceive
this measure will fall with peculiar severity upon them,
as by prohibiting the erection of all but expensive edifices,
it places the matter out of their reach and, consequently,
deprives them of all hope and inflicts, they conceive, a
great blow on the social and moral improvement of the working
classes.
'We
therefore pray your Honourable House will not give your
sanction to the Bill in its present form or, at least until
lines and levels of the streets are fully determined and
the footpaths and streets throughout the City formed.
'And
your petitioners etc
.'
Signatories: [Alphabetically sorted for convenience - JW]
ASHER,
A, Shortland-street
BACON, William
BARCHARD, Alfred
BEESON, George
BELL, John
BELL, Thos
BETTS, Alfred G
BINNS, Richard
BLAGROVE, Valentine J
CALLAN, Phillip
CARR, James W
COMMONS, J
COSTLEY, Edward, Shortland-street
CROMWELL, Alex.
DALDY, W C
DEMPSEY, William
DENNET, William
DINGWALL, A
DOYLE, Thomas
EDWARDS, Samuel P
ENGLAND, Joseph
EVANS, Robert
EVITT, D
FAGIN, Thomas
FINLEY, John
FLEMING, Matthew
GARTY, John
GIMBLE, G
GRACE, Peter
GRIFFITH, W
GRIGG, R
GRIMLEY, James
HANNKEN, Frederick
HARKIN, Wm
HARP, J
HARRIS, C A
HENRY, John
HOLMES, John
JEFFREY, John
JERRARD, John C
JOHNSON, James
KELLY, John
LANDER, John
LEE, Walter
LYNCH, Daniel
MacDOUGALL, John
MAKEPEACE, John
MARKS, Morris, Fort-street
|
MARSHALL,
Alex.
McCARTHEY, Emma
McCAUL, Walter
McDONALD, William, dealer
McEWIN, Isaac
McGARVEY, William
McGECHIE, John
McGRATH, John
McKINLY, George
McLARNON, James A
McLEOD, James
MILLARD, William
MILLS, Samuel
MOORES, H B
OLIVER, Aitchinson
OTTO, A
PARKER, William
PATERSON, George
PHILLIPS, Phillip A
POLLOCK, Robert
RAMPLING, J
RING, Charles
ROBERTSON, Peter
ROSE, William
RUSSELL, David
RUSSELL, Thomas
SCHULTZ, Robert
SEKER, Michael
SHEEHAN, David
SMITH, George, Greyhound
SNODGRASS, David
SOALL, James
SOMERVILL, Hendry
SOMERVILLE, Thos
SUTHERLAND, Donald
THOMPSON, Robert
THORBURN, J A
THORBURN, Wm Lang
VAILE, G E
VAILE, Samuel
WATSON, John
WESTWOOD, James
WHELEN, Patrick
WINCH, C
WRIGHT, Alexander
WRIGHT, J
YOUNG, Joseph
|
|